Ecuador vs Malawi: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 4,794 1000 USD against 4,749 1000 USD in Malawi, a difference of 45 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Malawi ranks 43rd of 168 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,220 1000 USD | 220.55 1000 USD | 2,999 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 12,081 1000 USD | 2,289 1000 USD | 9,792 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 6,319 1000 USD | 5,004 1000 USD | 1,316 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Ecuador, at 4,794 1000 USD against 4,749 1000 USD in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 45 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 42nd and Malawi ranks 43rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf