Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Production
Kazakhstan
145 t
in 2020
Malawi
0.01 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
11th
Malawi rank
14th
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Production over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malawi
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 145 t against 0.01 t in Malawi, a difference of 144.99 t.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 14th of 47 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 798.29 t | 0 t | 798.29 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 145 t | 0.1 t | 144.9 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — production, Kazakhstan or Malawi?
- Kazakhstan, at 145 t against 0.01 t in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — production between Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 144.99 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malawi rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — production?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 14th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf