New Caledonia vs Poland: Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Production
Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Production over time
- New Caledonia
- Poland
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 135 t against 2 t in Poland, a difference of 133 t.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 67.5 times Poland's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 12th and Poland ranks 13th of 47 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 128.12 t | 18.33 t | 109.79 t | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 156.5 t | 49.5 t | 107 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — production, New Caledonia or Poland?
- New Caledonia, at 135 t against 2 t in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — production between New Caledonia and Poland?
- 133 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do New Caledonia and Poland rank globally for potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (sop) — production?
- New Caledonia ranks 12th and Poland ranks 13th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium sulphate (sulphate of potash) (SOP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf