China, Hong Kong SAR vs Estonia: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth
Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Estonia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 6.4 % change on previous year against 4.78 % change on previous year in Estonia, a difference of 1.62 % change on previous year.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.3 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 14th of 67 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -15.55 % change on previous year | -9.6 % change on previous year | 5.95 % change on previous year | Estonia |
| 2000s | 1.12 % change on previous year | -3.59 % change on previous year | 4.71 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 15.03 % change on previous year | 1.17 % change on previous year | 13.85 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | -0.0516 % change on previous year | 1.31 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher poultry birds — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, China, Hong Kong SAR or Estonia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 6.4 % change on previous year against 4.78 % change on previous year in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in poultry birds — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia?
- 1.62 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia rank globally for poultry birds — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 11th and Estonia ranks 14th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.