China, Macao SAR vs India: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth

China, Macao SAR
1.69 % change on previous year
in 2023
India
1.58 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
27th
India rank
29th

Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • India
-20-1001020196219922023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 1.69 % change on previous year against 1.58 % change on previous year in India, a difference of 0.11 % change on previous year.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 27th and India ranks 29th of 67 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and India in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR India Difference Ahead
1960s 3.86 % change on previous year 2.33 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1970s 5.57 % change on previous year 3.77 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s 0.2346 % change on previous year 4.3 % change on previous year 4.07 % change on previous year India
1990s 3.24 % change on previous year 3.11 % change on previous year 0.1284 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2000s 1.35 % change on previous year 5.51 % change on previous year 4.16 % change on previous year India
2010s 1.11 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year 1.97 % change on previous year India
2020s 1.06 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 1.23 % change on previous year India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry birds — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth, China, Macao SAR or India?
China, Macao SAR, at 1.69 % change on previous year against 1.58 % change on previous year in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in poultry birds — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth between China, Macao SAR and India?
0.11 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and India?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and India rank globally for poultry birds — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth?
China, Macao SAR ranks 27th and India ranks 29th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs India: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/india/">China, Macao SAR vs India: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
88 places, 4,730 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.