Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
708,853 kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
313,184 kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
15th
Uzbekistan rank
17th

Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 708,853 kg against 313,184 kg in Uzbekistan, a difference of 395,669 kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.3 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 33 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 236,175 kg 76,601 kg 159,574 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 316,230 kg 76,136 kg 240,094 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 550,250 kg 191,852 kg 358,398 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 715,771 kg 291,330 kg 424,442 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry birds — losses from manure treated, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 708,853 kg against 313,184 kg in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in poultry birds — losses from manure treated between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
395,669 kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for poultry birds — losses from manure treated?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poultry Birds — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,087 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).