Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils

Equatorial Guinea
33,884 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
23,888 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
185th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
187th

Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 33,884 kg against 23,888 kg in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 9,996 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 187th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 9,769 kg 6,184 kg 3,585 kg Equatorial Guinea
1970s 12,633 kg 8,883 kg 3,750 kg Equatorial Guinea
1980s 18,385 kg 11,973 kg 6,411 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 24,981 kg 22,332 kg 2,649 kg Equatorial Guinea
2000s 29,144 kg 35,437 kg 6,293 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 32,280 kg 27,106 kg 5,175 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 33,798 kg 26,990 kg 6,808 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry birds — manure applied to soils, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 33,884 kg against 23,888 kg in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in poultry birds — manure applied to soils between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
9,996 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for poultry birds — manure applied to soils?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 187th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,087 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).