Georgia vs Mauritius: Poultry Birds β Manure applied to soils
Poultry Birds β Manure applied to soils over time
- Georgia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1.29 million kg against 1.20 million kg in Mauritius, a difference of 86,240 kg.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 128th and Mauritius ranks 130th of 190 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.57 million kg | 475,383 kg | 1.09 million kg | Georgia |
| 2000s | 1.17 million kg | 790,099 kg | 383,594 kg | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1.10 million kg | 1.07 million kg | 33,889 kg | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1.35 million kg | 1.19 million kg | 161,295 kg | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher poultry birds β manure applied to soils, Georgia or Mauritius?
- Georgia, at 1.29 million kg against 1.20 million kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in poultry birds β manure applied to soils between Georgia and Mauritius?
- 86,240 kg, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Mauritius rank globally for poultry birds β manure applied to soils?
- Georgia ranks 128th and Mauritius ranks 130th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Poultry Birds β Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).