China, Macao SAR vs Iceland: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)

China, Macao SAR
1.69 % change on previous year
in 2023
Iceland
1.64 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
68th
Iceland rank
70th

Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content) over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Iceland
-40-200204060196219922023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 1.69 % change on previous year against 1.64 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 36 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 68th and Iceland ranks 70th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 3.86 % change on previous year 6.71 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year Iceland
1970s 5.57 % change on previous year 10.92 % change on previous year 5.35 % change on previous year Iceland
1980s 0.2346 % change on previous year 0.627 % change on previous year 0.3924 % change on previous year Iceland
1990s 3.24 % change on previous year -5.39 % change on previous year 8.63 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2000s 1.35 % change on previous year 3.93 % change on previous year 2.59 % change on previous year Iceland
2010s 1.11 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year 2.98 % change on previous year Iceland
2020s 1.06 % change on previous year 0.1626 % change on previous year 0.8994 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry birds — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), China, Macao SAR or Iceland?
China, Macao SAR, at 1.69 % change on previous year against 1.64 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in poultry birds — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content) between China, Macao SAR and Iceland?
0.05 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Iceland rank globally for poultry birds — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content)?
China, Macao SAR ranks 68th and Iceland ranks 70th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Iceland: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/iceland/">China, Macao SAR vs Iceland: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 13,829 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.