Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Barbados
249,582 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
289,089 kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
126th

Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Barbados
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 289,089 kg against 249,582 kg in Barbados, a difference of 39,507 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 193 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 15,501 kg 114,669 kg 99,168 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 44,820 kg 135,612 kg 90,793 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 109,145 kg 142,718 kg 33,574 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 147,325 kg 219,642 kg 72,317 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 165,865 kg 386,910 kg 221,044 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 207,436 kg 279,372 kg 71,935 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 245,127 kg 295,302 kg 50,175 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry birds — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Barbados or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 289,089 kg against 249,582 kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in poultry birds — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Barbados and Zimbabwe?
39,507 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for poultry birds — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Barbados ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/barbados/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/barbados/zimbabwe/">Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poultry Birds — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,087 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).