Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Poultry Birds — Stocks

Russian Federation
530.01 million An
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
42.00 million An
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Poultry Birds — Stocks over time

  • Russian Federation
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 530.01 million An against 42.00 million An in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 488.01 million An.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 12.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 193 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 477.65 million An 27.32 million An 450.33 million An Russian Federation
2000s 356.99 million An 32.45 million An 324.54 million An Russian Federation
2010s 489.91 million An 35.98 million An 453.94 million An Russian Federation
2020s 519.28 million An 41.33 million An 477.95 million An Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poultry birds — stocks, Russian Federation or United Republic of Tanzania?
Russian Federation, at 530.01 million An against 42.00 million An in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in poultry birds — stocks between Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
488.01 million An, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for poultry birds — stocks?
Russian Federation ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Poultry Birds — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Poultry Birds — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-stocks/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/poultry-birds-stocks/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Poultry Birds — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poultry Birds — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,087 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).