Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Primary Forest — Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
137,661 1000 ha
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
19,444 1000 ha
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th
Papua New Guinea rank
9th

Primary Forest — Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Papua New Guinea
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020072025

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 137,661 1000 ha against 19,444 1000 ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 118,217 1000 ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 7.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 9th of 30 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 156,172 1000 ha 19,710 1000 ha 136,462 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 149,596 1000 ha 19,643 1000 ha 129,953 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 142,170 1000 ha 19,569 1000 ha 122,601 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 138,504 1000 ha 19,476 1000 ha 119,027 1000 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary forest — area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Papua New Guinea?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 137,661 1000 ha against 19,444 1000 ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in primary forest — area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
118,217 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for primary forest — area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th and Papua New Guinea ranks 9th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Primary Forest — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Primary Forest — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/primary-forest-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/primary-forest-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/papua-new-guinea/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Primary Forest — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary Forest — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 7,156 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.