Ecuador vs Eswatini: Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value, per

Ecuador
1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
102nd
Eswatini rank
105th

Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eswatini
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 102nd and Eswatini ranks 105th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0722 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0257 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0465 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.1432 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1168 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.4572 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0702 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.387 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.7221 1000 USD per square kilometre 0 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7221 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.866 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8642 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1497 1000 USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2717 1000 USD per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary wood and paper products (export/import) — import value, per, Ecuador or Eswatini?
Ecuador, at 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary wood and paper products (export/import) — import value, per between Ecuador and Eswatini?
0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
55 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for primary wood and paper products (export/import) — import value, per?
Ecuador ranks 102nd and Eswatini ranks 105th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eswatini: Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/primary-wood-and-paper-products-export-import-import-value-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/primary-wood-and-paper-products-export-import-import-value-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/eswatini/">Ecuador vs Eswatini: Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 9,473 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary wood and paper products (export/import) — Import value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.