Guam vs Uzbekistan: Printing and writing papers — Import quantity, per capita
Guam
0.0026 t per person
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0.0023 t per person
in 2024
Guam rank
103rd
Uzbekistan rank
105th
Printing and writing papers — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Guam
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0.0026 t per person against 0.0023 t per person in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 103rd and Uzbekistan ranks 105th of 184 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0096 t per person | 0.0037 t per person | 0.0059 t per person | Guam |
| 2020s | 0.004 t per person | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0019 t per person | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher printing and writing papers — import quantity, per capita, Guam or Uzbekistan?
- Guam, at 0.0026 t per person against 0.0023 t per person in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in printing and writing papers — import quantity, per capita between Guam and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Uzbekistan rank globally for printing and writing papers — import quantity, per capita?
- Guam ranks 103rd and Uzbekistan ranks 105th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Printing and writing papers — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Printing and writing papers — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.