Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Proportion of children moderately or severely wasted
Australia and New Zealand
0.5%
in 2024
Chile
0.3%
in 2014
Australia and New Zealand rank
78th
Chile rank
81st
Proportion of children moderately or severely wasted over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Chile
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.5% against 0.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Chile's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 78th and Chile ranks 81st of 84 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.3% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of children moderately or severely wasted, Australia and New Zealand or Chile?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0.5% against 0.3% in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of children moderately or severely wasted between Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
- 0.2%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Chile rank globally for proportion of children moderately or severely wasted?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 78th and Chile ranks 81st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of children moderately or severely wasted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.