Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Forest certified for sustainable use

Papua New Guinea
14,770 thousands of hectares
in 2024
Sri Lanka
21,530 thousands of hectares
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
78th
Sri Lanka rank
75th

Forest certified for sustainable use over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020072024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 21,530 thousands of hectares against 14,770 thousands of hectares in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 6,760 thousands of hectares.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 246 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 0 thousands of hectares 0 thousands of hectares 0 thousands of hectares
2000s 15,830 thousands of hectares 17,655 thousands of hectares 1,825 thousands of hectares Sri Lanka
2010s 31,532 thousands of hectares 17,968 thousands of hectares 13,563 thousands of hectares Papua New Guinea
2020s 14,826 thousands of hectares 20,912 thousands of hectares 6,086 thousands of hectares Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest certified for sustainable use, Papua New Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 21,530 thousands of hectares against 14,770 thousands of hectares in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in forest certified for sustainable use between Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka?
6,760 thousands of hectares, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka?
14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for forest certified for sustainable use?
Papua New Guinea ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 246 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Forest certified for sustainable use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Forest certified for sustainable use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-certified-under-an-independently-verified-certification-scheme/papua-new-guinea/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-certified-under-an-independently-verified-certification-scheme/papua-new-guinea/sri-lanka/">Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Forest certified for sustainable use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest certified for sustainable use
Unit
thousands of hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
246 places, 3,444 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares).