Australia and New Zealand vs Saint Pierre and Miquelon: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan

Australia and New Zealand
75.3%
in 2025
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
76.7%
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
41st
Saint Pierre and Miquelon rank
39th

Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon
020406080100199020072025

How they compare

Saint Pierre and Miquelon currently reports 76.7% against 75.3% in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.4%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 39th of 129 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Saint Pierre and Miquelon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Saint Pierre and Miquelon Difference Ahead
1990s 64.5% 0.0% 64.5% Australia and New Zealand
2000s 71.1% 0.0% 71.1% Australia and New Zealand
2010s 75.0% 97.4% 22.4% Saint Pierre and Miquelon
2020s 75.3% 81.2% 5.9% Saint Pierre and Miquelon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Australia and New Zealand or Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
Saint Pierre and Miquelon, at 76.7% against 75.3% in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Australia and New Zealand and Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
1.4%, with Saint Pierre and Miquelon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Saint Pierre and Miquelon rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 39th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Saint Pierre and Miquelon: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/australia-and-new-zealand/saint-pierre-and-miquelon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/australia-and-new-zealand/saint-pierre-and-miquelon/">Australia and New Zealand vs Saint Pierre and Miquelon: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
164 places, 975 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed