Austria vs Nepal: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Austria
51.4%
in 2025
Nepal
56.3%
in 2025
Austria rank
55th
Nepal rank
54th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Austria
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 56.3% against 51.4% in Austria, a difference of 4.9%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 54th of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.7% | 19.0% | 28.7% | Austria |
| 2000s | 48.5% | 48.5% | 0.1% | Austria |
| 2010s | 49.9% | 57.5% | 7.6% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 50.8% | 56.6% | 5.9% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Austria or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 56.3% against 51.4% in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Austria and Nepal?
- 4.9%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Nepal rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Austria ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 54th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.