Belarus vs Croatia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Belarus
100.0%
in 2025
Croatia
100.0%
in 2025
Belarus rank
1st
Croatia rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Belarus
- Croatia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Croatia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.1% | 65.9% | 24.2% | Belarus |
| 2000s | 95.8% | 71.6% | 24.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 80.1% | 19.9% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Belarus or Croatia?
- Belarus, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Belarus and Croatia?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.