Belarus vs Eastern Europe: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Belarus
100.0%
in 2025
Eastern Europe
99.7%
in 2025
Belarus rank
1st
Eastern Europe rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Belarus
- Eastern Europe
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100.0% against 99.7% in Eastern Europe, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eastern Europe ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and Eastern Europe ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Eastern Europe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eastern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.1% | 98.0% | 7.9% | Eastern Europe |
| 2000s | 95.8% | 98.2% | 2.4% | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.5% | 0.5% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 99.7% | 0.3% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Belarus or Eastern Europe?
- Belarus, at 100.0% against 99.7% in Eastern Europe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Belarus and Eastern Europe?
- 0.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eastern Europe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Eastern Europe rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Eastern Europe ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.