Belarus vs Russian Federation: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Belarus
100.0%
in 2025
Russian Federation
100.0%
in 2025
Belarus rank
1st
Russian Federation rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Belarus
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.1% | 98.6% | 8.5% | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 95.8% | 98.7% | 2.9% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.9% | 0.1% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Belarus or Russian Federation?
- Belarus, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Belarus and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Russian Federation rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.