Central Asia vs Croatia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Central Asia
97.2%
in 2025
Croatia
100.0%
in 2025
Central Asia rank
2nd
Croatia rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Central Asia
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 100.0% against 97.2% in Central Asia, a difference of 2.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 2nd and Croatia ranks 1st of 31 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 3 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.2% | 65.9% | 1.4% | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 74.7% | 71.6% | 3.1% | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 83.0% | 80.1% | 2.9% | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 96.9% | 100.0% | 3.1% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Central Asia or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 100.0% against 97.2% in Central Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Central Asia and Croatia?
- 2.8%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Croatia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Central Asia and Croatia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Central Asia ranks 2nd and Croatia ranks 1st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.