Central Asia vs Hungary: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Central Asia
97.2%
in 2025
Hungary
100.0%
in 2025
Central Asia rank
2nd
Hungary rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Central Asia
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 100.0% against 97.2% in Central Asia, a difference of 2.8%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 2nd and Hungary ranks 1st of 31 groups.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.2% | 88.0% | 20.8% | Hungary |
| 2000s | 74.7% | 93.2% | 18.5% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 83.0% | 99.7% | 16.7% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 96.9% | 99.9% | 3.0% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Central Asia or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 100.0% against 97.2% in Central Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Central Asia and Hungary?
- 2.8%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Hungary?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Central Asia and Hungary rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Central Asia ranks 2nd and Hungary ranks 1st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.