Central Asia vs Russian Federation: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Central Asia
97.2%
in 2025
Russian Federation
100.0%
in 2025
Central Asia rank
2nd
Russian Federation rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Central Asia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 100.0% against 97.2% in Central Asia, a difference of 2.8%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 31 groups.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.2% | 98.6% | 31.4% | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 74.7% | 98.7% | 24.0% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 83.0% | 99.9% | 16.9% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 96.9% | 100.0% | 3.1% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Central Asia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 100.0% against 97.2% in Central Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Central Asia and Russian Federation?
- 2.8%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Central Asia and Russian Federation rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Central Asia ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.