Cook Islands vs Iceland: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Cook Islands
95.6%
in 2025
Iceland
96.3%
in 2025
Cook Islands rank
19th
Iceland rank
17th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Cook Islands
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 96.3% against 95.6% in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 17th of 105 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.6% | 18.0% | 77.7% | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 95.6% | 44.2% | 51.4% | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 95.6% | 78.7% | 16.9% | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 95.6% | 93.5% | 2.2% | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Cook Islands or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 96.3% against 95.6% in Cook Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Cook Islands and Iceland?
- 0.7%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cook Islands and Iceland rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Cook Islands ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 17th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.