Croatia vs Hungary: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Croatia
100.0%
in 2025
Hungary
100.0%
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Hungary rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Croatia
- Hungary
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Hungary, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Croatia ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.9% | 88.0% | 22.1% | Hungary |
| 2000s | 71.6% | 93.2% | 21.6% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 80.1% | 99.7% | 19.6% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 99.9% | 0.1% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Croatia or Hungary?
- Croatia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Croatia and Hungary?
- 0.0%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Hungary?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Hungary rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Croatia ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.