Eastern Europe vs Lithuania: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Eastern Europe
99.7%
in 2025
Lithuania
100.0%
in 2025
Eastern Europe rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Eastern Europe
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 100.0% against 99.7% in Eastern Europe, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eastern Europe ahead.
Eastern Europe ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 31 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eastern Europe averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98.0% | 88.9% | 9.1% | Eastern Europe |
| 2000s | 98.2% | 92.4% | 5.8% | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 99.5% | 99.6% | 0.1% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 99.7% | 100.0% | 0.3% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Eastern Europe or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 100.0% against 99.7% in Eastern Europe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Eastern Europe and Lithuania?
- 0.3%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Europe and Lithuania rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Eastern Europe ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.