Eastern Europe vs Russian Federation: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Eastern Europe
99.7%
in 2025
Russian Federation
100.0%
in 2025
Eastern Europe rank
1st
Russian Federation rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Eastern Europe
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 100.0% against 99.7% in Eastern Europe, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 35 groups.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98.0% | 98.6% | 0.6% | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 98.2% | 98.7% | 0.5% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 99.5% | 99.9% | 0.4% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 99.7% | 100.0% | 0.3% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Eastern Europe or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 100.0% against 99.7% in Eastern Europe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Eastern Europe and Russian Federation?
- 0.3%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Europe and Russian Federation rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Eastern Europe ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 35 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.