Ecuador vs Serbia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Ecuador
46.8%
in 2025
Serbia
42.4%
in 2025
Ecuador rank
59th
Serbia rank
60th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 46.8% against 42.4% in Serbia, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 60th of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.3% | 36.9% | 10.6% | Serbia |
| 2000s | 33.9% | 36.9% | 3.0% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 42.0% | 37.5% | 4.5% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 46.9% | 39.8% | 7.1% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 46.8% against 42.4% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 4.4%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Ecuador ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 60th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.