Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan

Iceland
96.3%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
40.9%
in 2025
Iceland rank
17th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
16th

Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time

  • Iceland
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
20406080100199020072025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 96.3% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 55.4%.

That makes Iceland's figure about 2.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Iceland ranks 17th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th of 104 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 18.0% 29.4% 11.4% Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2000s 44.2% 30.5% 13.7% Iceland
2010s 78.7% 34.9% 43.8% Iceland
2020s 93.5% 39.0% 54.4% Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Iceland or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Iceland, at 96.3% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
55.4%, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
Iceland ranks 17th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/iceland/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/iceland/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Iceland vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
154 places, 916 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed