Iceland vs Oceania: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Iceland
96.3%
in 2025
Oceania
28.3%
in 2025
Iceland rank
17th
Oceania rank
21st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Iceland
- Oceania
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 96.3% against 28.3% in Oceania, a difference of 68.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 3.4 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Oceania ahead.
Iceland ranks 17th and Oceania ranks 21st of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.0% | 25.9% | 7.9% | Oceania |
| 2000s | 44.2% | 27.4% | 16.9% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 78.7% | 28.2% | 50.5% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 93.5% | 28.3% | 65.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Iceland or Oceania?
- Iceland, at 96.3% against 28.3% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Iceland and Oceania?
- 68.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Oceania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Oceania rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Iceland ranks 17th and Oceania ranks 21st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.