Kyrgyzstan vs Latvia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Kyrgyzstan
93.2%
in 2025
Latvia
95.3%
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
26th
Latvia rank
25th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 95.3% against 93.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.1%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 129 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.1% | 86.4% | 19.3% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 68.8% | 88.4% | 19.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 73.2% | 91.7% | 18.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 91.3% | 94.4% | 3.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Kyrgyzstan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 95.3% against 93.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Kyrgyzstan and Latvia?
- 2.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Latvia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.