Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
40.9%
in 2025
Latvia
95.3%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
16th
Latvia rank
19th

Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Latvia
20406080100199020072025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 95.3% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 54.4%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 2.3 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 19th of 39 regions.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 29.4% 86.4% 57.1% Latvia
2000s 30.5% 88.4% 57.8% Latvia
2010s 34.9% 91.7% 56.8% Latvia
2020s 39.0% 94.4% 55.3% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 95.3% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
54.4%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 19th of 39 regions.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/latvia/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
154 places, 916 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed