Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Mongolia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
40.9%
in 2025
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
20th
Mongolia rank
18th

Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Mongolia
20406080100199020072025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 100.0% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 59.1%.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 groups.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 29.4% 100.0% 70.7% Mongolia
2000s 30.5% 100.0% 69.5% Mongolia
2010s 34.9% 100.0% 65.1% Mongolia
2020s 39.0% 100.0% 60.9% Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 100.0% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Mongolia?
59.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Mongolia?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Mongolia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Mongolia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/mongolia/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Mongolia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
164 places, 975 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed