Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Poland, Republic of: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
40.9%
in 2025
Poland, Republic of
98.6%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
16th
Poland, Republic of rank
16th

Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Poland, Republic of
20406080100199020072025

How they compare

Poland, Republic of currently reports 98.6% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 57.7%.

That makes Poland, Republic of's figure about 2.4 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Poland, Republic of ranks 16th of 39 regions.

Poland, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Poland, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 30.5% 89.8% 59.3% Poland, Republic of
2010s 34.9% 93.2% 58.3% Poland, Republic of
2020s 39.0% 98.1% 59.0% Poland, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Poland, Republic of?
Poland, Republic of, at 98.6% against 40.9% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Poland, Republic of?
57.7%, with Poland, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Poland, Republic of?
5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Poland, Republic of rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th and Poland, Republic of ranks 16th of 39 regions.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Poland, Republic of: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Poland, Republic of: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
154 places, 916 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed