Latvia vs Oceania: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Latvia
95.3%
in 2025
Oceania
28.3%
in 2025
Latvia rank
20th
Oceania rank
21st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Latvia
- Oceania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 95.3% against 28.3% in Oceania, a difference of 67.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 3.4 times Oceania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 20th and Oceania ranks 21st of 105 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86.4% | 25.9% | 60.5% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 88.4% | 27.4% | 61.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 91.7% | 28.2% | 63.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 94.4% | 28.3% | 66.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Latvia or Oceania?
- Latvia, at 95.3% against 28.3% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Latvia and Oceania?
- 67.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oceania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Oceania rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Latvia ranks 20th and Oceania ranks 21st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.