Malaysia vs Norway: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Malaysia
57.4%
in 2025
Norway
57.2%
in 2025
Malaysia rank
51st
Norway rank
53rd
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Malaysia
- Norway
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 57.4% against 57.2% in Norway, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 51st and Norway ranks 53rd of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.0% | 32.4% | 14.5% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 45.7% | 39.1% | 6.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 53.0% | 38.2% | 14.8% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 56.6% | 56.8% | 0.2% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Malaysia or Norway?
- Malaysia, at 57.4% against 57.2% in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Malaysia and Norway?
- 0.2%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Malaysia ranks 51st and Norway ranks 53rd of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.