Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Mauritius
21.6%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
21.5%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
74th
Zimbabwe rank
75th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Mauritius
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 21.6% against 21.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mauritius ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 105 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.7% | 21.5% | 6.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 20.5% | 21.5% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 21.6% | 21.5% | 0.1% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 21.6% | 21.5% | 0.1% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
- Mauritius, at 21.6% against 21.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Mauritius ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.