New Zealand vs Tunisia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
New Zealand
75.3%
in 2025
Tunisia
70.1%
in 2025
New Zealand rank
42nd
Tunisia rank
45th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- New Zealand
- Tunisia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 75.3% against 70.1% in Tunisia, a difference of 5.2%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 42nd and Tunisia ranks 45th of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.5% | 69.0% | 4.4% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 71.1% | 69.0% | 2.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 75.0% | 69.0% | 6.0% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 75.3% | 70.1% | 5.2% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, New Zealand or Tunisia?
- New Zealand, at 75.3% against 70.1% in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 5.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- New Zealand ranks 42nd and Tunisia ranks 45th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.