Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Sweden: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
14.8%
in 2025
Sweden
83.4%
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
33rd
Sweden rank
32nd

Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Sweden
20406080100199020072025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 83.4% against 14.8% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 68.6%.

That makes Sweden's figure about 5.6 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 33rd and Sweden ranks 32nd of 35 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 14.8% 95.3% 80.6% Sweden
2000s 14.8% 95.7% 80.9% Sweden
2010s 14.8% 81.1% 66.3% Sweden
2020s 14.8% 83.4% 68.6% Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 83.4% against 14.8% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Sweden?
68.6%, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Sweden?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Sweden rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 33rd and Sweden ranks 32nd of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Sweden: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-forest-area-with-a-long-term-management-plan-percent/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/sweden/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Sweden: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
164 places, 975 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed