Oceania vs Ukraine: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Oceania
28.3%
in 2025
Ukraine
91.2%
in 2025
Oceania rank
21st
Ukraine rank
22nd
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Oceania
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 91.2% against 28.3% in Oceania, a difference of 62.9%.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 3.2 times Oceania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 21st and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 31 groups.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.9% | 76.7% | 50.8% | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 27.4% | 85.2% | 57.8% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 88.2% | 60.0% | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 28.3% | 90.2% | 61.9% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Oceania or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 91.2% against 28.3% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Oceania and Ukraine?
- 62.9%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Ukraine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Oceania and Ukraine rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Oceania ranks 21st and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.