Oceania vs Uzbekistan: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Oceania
28.3%
in 2025
Uzbekistan
95.8%
in 2025
Oceania rank
21st
Uzbekistan rank
18th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Oceania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 95.8% against 28.3% in Oceania, a difference of 67.5%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 3.4 times Oceania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 31 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.9% | 40.9% | 15.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 27.4% | 57.5% | 30.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 73.7% | 45.5% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 28.3% | 95.8% | 67.5% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Oceania or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 95.8% against 28.3% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Oceania and Uzbekistan?
- 67.5%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Oceania and Uzbekistan rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Oceania ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.