Réunion vs Réunion: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Réunion
64.8%
in 2025
Réunion
64.8%
in 2025
Réunion rank
51st
Réunion rank
51st
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Réunion
- Réunion
How they compare
Réunion currently reports 64.8% against 64.8% in Réunion, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Réunion has been ahead every year.
Réunion ranks 51st and Réunion ranks 51st of 129 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Réunion | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.3% | 47.3% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 81.5% | 81.5% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 81.5% | 81.5% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 64.8% | 64.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Réunion or Réunion?
- Réunion, at 64.8% against 64.8% in Réunion as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Réunion and Réunion?
- 0.0%, with Réunion ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Réunion and Réunion?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Réunion and Réunion rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Réunion ranks 51st and Réunion ranks 51st of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.