Romania vs Southern Africa: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Romania
81.0%
in 2025
Southern Africa
8.1%
in 2025
Romania rank
36th
Southern Africa rank
35th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Romania
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Romania currently reports 81.0% against 8.1% in Southern Africa, a difference of 72.9%.
That makes Romania's figure about 10.0 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 36th and Southern Africa ranks 35th of 129 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.3% | 7.4% | 84.9% | Romania |
| 2000s | 86.7% | 7.4% | 79.3% | Romania |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 8.1% | 73.3% | Romania |
| 2020s | 81.0% | 8.1% | 72.9% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Romania or Southern Africa?
- Romania, at 81.0% against 8.1% in Southern Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Romania and Southern Africa?
- 72.9%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Southern Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Southern Africa rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Romania ranks 36th and Southern Africa ranks 35th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.