Romania vs Zambia: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Romania
81.0%
in 2025
Zambia
82.5%
in 2025
Romania rank
29th
Zambia rank
28th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Romania
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 82.5% against 81.0% in Romania, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 29th and Zambia ranks 28th of 105 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.3% | 69.6% | 22.8% | Romania |
| 2000s | 86.7% | 69.6% | 17.1% | Romania |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 69.6% | 11.9% | Romania |
| 2020s | 81.0% | 76.1% | 4.9% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Romania or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 82.5% against 81.0% in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Romania and Zambia?
- 1.5%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Zambia rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Romania ranks 29th and Zambia ranks 28th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.