Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan
Tonga
22.9%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
21.5%
in 2025
Tonga rank
72nd
Zimbabwe rank
75th
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan over time
- Tonga
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 22.9% against 21.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Tonga ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 105 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 21.5% | 1.4% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
- Tonga, at 22.9% against 21.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 1.4%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan?
- Tonga ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.