Argentina vs Namibia: Share of forest with a long-term management plan
Argentina
2.7%
in 2025
Namibia
2.6%
in 2025
Argentina rank
113th
Namibia rank
114th
Share of forest with a long-term management plan over time
- Argentina
- Namibia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 2.7% against 2.6% in Namibia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 113th and Namibia ranks 114th of 131 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.6% | 0.5% | 1.1% | Argentina |
| 2000s | 2.2% | 0.7% | 1.5% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 2.6% | 0.1% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2.7% | 2.6% | 0.1% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of forest with a long-term management plan, Argentina or Namibia?
- Argentina, at 2.7% against 2.6% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of forest with a long-term management plan between Argentina and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for share of forest with a long-term management plan?
- Argentina ranks 113th and Namibia ranks 114th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of forest with a long-term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%).