Australia vs Congo: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Australia
32.5
in 2020
Congo
35.84
in 2020
Australia rank
71st
Congo rank
69th
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 35.84 against 32.5 in Australia, a difference of 3.34.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Australia ranks 71st and Congo ranks 69th of 119 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.66 | 31.16 | 0.5 | Congo |
| 2020s | 32.5 | 35.84 | 3.34 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Australia or Congo?
- Congo, at 35.84 against 32.5 in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Australia and Congo?
- 3.34, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Australia ranks 71st and Congo ranks 69th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.