Australia vs Suriname: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Australia
32.5
in 2020
Suriname
29.68
in 2020
Australia rank
71st
Suriname rank
73rd
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Australia
- Suriname
How they compare
Australia currently reports 32.5 against 29.68 in Suriname, a difference of 2.82.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Suriname ahead.
Australia ranks 71st and Suriname ranks 73rd of 119 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.66 | 27.79 | 2.87 | Australia |
| 2020s | 32.5 | 29.68 | 2.82 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Australia or Suriname?
- Australia, at 32.5 against 29.68 in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Australia and Suriname?
- 2.82, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Australia ranks 71st and Suriname ranks 73rd of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.