Belarus vs Croatia: Proportion of forest area with long term management plan
Belarus
100
in 2020
Croatia
100
in 2020
Belarus rank
1st
Croatia rank
1st
Proportion of forest area with long term management plan over time
- Belarus
- Croatia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100 against 100 in Croatia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 119 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.82 | 71.64 | 24.18 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 99.99 | 87.86 | 12.13 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 100 | 100 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of forest area with long term management plan, Belarus or Croatia?
- Belarus, at 100 against 100 in Croatia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in proportion of forest area with long term management plan between Belarus and Croatia?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for proportion of forest area with long term management plan?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Croatia ranks 1st of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Proportion of forest area with long term management plan. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.